I never could shake much of it out of them other than generalizations - they just didn't have the time to put it all together for me and didn't see a need for any of it to become public anyway. I was close friends with Ken French at Tim Pancurak at TC for many years and talked to them often about things like problems end users where having with some of their products, what the public wanted and in trying to gather production specifics from them - both on the phone and in many hours spent with them at SHOT shows. Some "experts" will argue or debate them, but that’s nothing new from ACE's. Hopefully these random thoughts from years of experience trying to do the same will give you an idea of the can of worms you are opening. "This tape will self destruct in five seconds" pretty much summarizes your quest. One of those been there done that things on Contenders and TC’s traditional muzzleloaders. While some elements can be achieved, I have to say that many will fall under the mission impossible moniker. Second picture shoes the integrated lever system.Īll help, thoughts and observations would be appreciated. Note the hole on the hammer face that contains the "safety pin" Next: Lever on top of hammer that has three positions (C Safe R).įinally, the "easy open" modification occurred after the final safety change(?)ĭates? S/N's associated with these changes?įirst picture shows the half screwhead rim/centerfire selector along with the transverse pin that engages the safety. Next generation: Hammer block safety using a transverse pin that extends a pin on the hammer face that prevents it from contacting the firing pin. no safety, screw head on hammer with a cutaway so that one must turn it so that the un-cutaway portion strikes the appropriate centerfire or rimfire firing pin. Are these the major changes? Are there others that should be included? The major changes seem to revolve around the safety, rim/centerfire selection and the "Easy Open" feature. First concerns the evolution of the Contender. In any event, I wanted to ask some questions. Differences between barrels that were made at different times. Stuff like screw sizes, grip differences between the Contender, G2 and Encore. However, since 8/2008 all receivers, new or used, are supposed to be transferred as "other firearm" in section 18, but that doesn't necessarily make them legal to make a pistol with, any more than a receiver transferred as "rifle" before that change makes it necessarily illegal to do so.I'm attemptingto put together a document that includes a bunch of information about Contenders that is largely from this forum. Seems to echo what I said, as far as I understand what you say, that the actual legality of what you can do with a firearm is not determined by what an FFL decides to put in section 18 or 29 on 4473. So when I transferred the Encore receiver as that I would have gotten a visit if it was a rifle. All was cleared up as soon as the agent seen a new Nodak receiver was used. The agent claimed he made a pistol illegally from a rifle. When he sold it the FFL used the trunion serial number rather than the receiver serial number and because the trunion serial number was used previously for a rifle the seller got a visit. He built a AK pistol on a virgin Nodak receiver. I am the 3rd owner and he 2nd owner called the first owner.Īlso, if it is a rifle and was transferred as anything else the ATF will call.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |